More than two decades after a highly publicised relationship and a bitter fallout, Ranvir Shorey has once again addressed the controversy surrounding Pooja Bhatt and her brother Rahul Bhatt. This time, his response came after Rahul revisited the 2002 incident and expressed regret over his own actions.
Some Bollywood controversies fade with time.
Others remain buried beneath conflicting accounts, unanswered questions and memories that resurface years later.
The long-running controversy involving Ranvir Shorey, Pooja Bhatt and Rahul Bhatt has now returned to public attention after Rahul Bhatt revisited the events of 2002 in a recent conversation with Siddharth Kannan.
His comments prompted Shorey to respond publicly on X, where the actor described more than 20 years of what he called “malicious propaganda and slander” and said he wanted to add what he considered a missing part of the story.
What Did Rahul Bhatt Say About the 2002 Incident?
Rahul Bhatt recently discussed the old controversy and acknowledged that his response during the confrontation had gone too far.
According to reports quoting his interview, Rahul said there had been an argument between Pooja Bhatt and Ranvir Shorey. He said he intervened after what he described as Shorey hitting Pooja, but acknowledged that his own reaction was excessive.
Rahul said he broke the glass of Shorey’s car and fractured one of Shorey’s ribs. He also acknowledged that he was arrested and charged after the incident.
Importantly, Rahul expressed regret over his actions and said he should not have taken the law into his own hands.
That admission has now brought renewed attention to an episode that had largely remained part of Bollywood’s past.
Ranvir Shorey’s Strong Response
Shorey responded to reports about Rahul’s comments on X on September 30.
He wrote that he was glad that what he described as more than 20 years of “malicious propaganda and slander” had finally given way to what he called “some truth.”
But Shorey did not stop there.
He added that he wanted to provide what he considered the “missing piece” of the story, saying that defending oneself against violence while trying to escape what he described as a toxic situation should not be characterised as “hitting.”
His statement effectively reopened a debate that had been largely defined by conflicting versions of the events.
Why Has the Controversy Lasted for So Long?
The controversy dates back to Shorey’s relationship with Pooja Bhatt in the early 2000s.
The two reportedly became close after working together on Jism and were in a live-in relationship before their relationship ended amid a highly publicised fallout in 2002.
What happened during the breakdown of the relationship has been described differently by the people involved.
Shorey has previously rejected allegations that he was physically abusive toward Pooja and has spoken about being portrayed negatively after the relationship ended. Pooja Bhatt and her family have offered different accounts of the events.
Because the original controversy involved private relationship disputes as well as a subsequent confrontation involving Rahul Bhatt, separating established facts from allegations and personal recollections remains important.
The Legal Chapter Rahul Bhatt Revisited
One of the most significant aspects of Rahul Bhatt’s recent comments was his discussion of the legal consequences following the confrontation.
Rahul said he was arrested and charged after the incident. He also said Shorey eventually agreed to compound the offence, allowing the case to be brought to an end, and praised Shorey for not seeking financial compensation from him.
Rahul described Shorey’s approach at the time as an example of letting bygones be bygones.
That part of the story is particularly notable because Rahul’s latest comments represent a more reflective assessment of his own conduct than the position he had publicly expressed around the time of the incident.
Shorey’s “Missing Piece” Changes the Conversation
For Shorey, however, Rahul’s admission does not simply close the chapter.
Instead, it appears to provide an opportunity to challenge how the incident has been discussed for years.
His central argument is that the public narrative focused on the allegation that he had “hit” Pooja, while, in his account, the circumstances surrounding the confrontation and his subsequent attempt to defend himself were not adequately represented.
That distinction is at the heart of his latest statement.
It is also why the actor chose to speak publicly after remaining relatively quiet about the episode for years.
What Can Actually Be Established?
There are several elements that have been reported consistently in the recent accounts:
- Ranvir Shorey and Pooja Bhatt were in a relationship in the early 2000s.
- Their relationship ended amid a highly publicised controversy in 2002.
- Rahul Bhatt intervened during a confrontation involving Shorey and Pooja.
- Rahul has now acknowledged that his reaction was excessive.
- He said he damaged Shorey’s car and injured him.
- Rahul said he was arrested and charged following the incident.
- He has expressed regret over his actions.
- Shorey has disputed the long-standing characterisation of his role in the confrontation and says his actions have been misrepresented.
At the same time, the precise details of the original dispute remain contested, and the different personal accounts should not automatically be treated as independently verified facts.
Why Are People Talking About It Again?
The timing is significant.
For years, the controversy was primarily remembered through old interviews, media reports and statements made by people connected to the episode.
Rahul Bhatt’s recent decision to revisit the incident—and acknowledge that he had overreacted—has effectively brought the subject back into the spotlight.
Shorey’s response has added another layer, because rather than simply accepting Rahul’s apology or remaining silent, he used the moment to challenge what he considers a misleading narrative about his role.
The result is a familiar Bollywood controversy being viewed through a different lens more than 20 years later.
Can a 20-Year-Old Controversy Finally Be Put to Rest?
That may ultimately depend on how the people involved choose to discuss it going forward.
For Rahul Bhatt, the latest comments represent an expression of regret over his actions during the confrontation.
For Ranvir Shorey, the episode remains connected to what he describes as years of damaging allegations and a public narrative he believes did not tell the complete story.
And for the public, the episode serves as a reminder of how difficult it can be to establish a definitive version of private events when the people involved remember them differently.
More than 20 years later, the controversy has resurfaced—not necessarily because the past has changed, but because one of the people involved has now chosen to revisit it and another has responded with his own version of the missing pieces.
Perhaps the most important question now is not simply what happened in 2002?
It is:
How much of a story can truly be understood when different people remember the same event in completely different ways?
Read more bollywood updates here
